z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The association between mean arterial pressure and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock: insights from the DOREMI trial
Author(s) -
Simon Parlow,
Pietro Di Santo,
Rebecca Mathew,
Richard G. Jung,
Trevor Simard,
Taylor Gillmore,
Brennan Mao,
Omar AbdelRazek,
F. Daniel Ramirez,
Jeffrey A. Marbach,
Alexander Dick,
Christopher Glover,
Juan Russo,
Michael Froeschl,
Marino Labinaz,
Shan M. Fernando,
Benjamin Hibbert
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european heart journal acute cardiovascular care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.42
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 2048-8734
pISSN - 2048-8726
DOI - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab052
Subject(s) - cardiogenic shock , medicine , mean arterial pressure , relative risk , dobutamine , cardiology , confidence interval , myocardial infarction , anesthesia , blood pressure , hemodynamics , heart rate
Aims Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of low cardiac output resulting in end-organ hypoperfusion. Despite high in-hospital mortality rates, little evidence exists regarding the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target in CS. We therefore evaluated the relationship between achieved MAP and clinical outcomes in patients with CS. Methods and results We performed a post hoc analysis of the CAPITAL DOREMI trial: a randomized, double-blind trial comparing dobutamine to milrinone in patients with CS. We divided patients into a high MAP group (average MAP ≥ 70 mmHg over the 36 h following randomization), and a low MAP group (average MAP < 70 mmHg). Our primary outcome included in-hospital all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, need for cardiac transplantation or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, transient ischaemic attack or stroke, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. In total, 71 (37.0%) patients achieved an average MAP < 70 mmHg, and 121 (63.0%) achieved an average MAP ≥ 70 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 48 (67.6%) patients in the low MAP group and 51 (42.2%) patients in the high MAP group [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.92; P = 0.01]. All-cause mortality occurred in 41 (57.8%) and 35 (28.9%) patients in the low and high MAP groups, respectively (aRR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40–0.79; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes between each group. Conclusions In patients with CS treated with inotrope therapy, low MAP is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Randomized data evaluating optimal MAP targets in CS is needed to guide medical therapy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom