z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure predicts in-hospital outcomes in takotsubo syndrome
Author(s) -
Marco Giuseppe Del Buono,
Rocco Antonio Montone,
Maria Chiara Meucci,
Giulia La Vecchia,
Massimiliano Camilli,
Luca Giraldi,
Daniela Pedicino,
Carlo Trani,
Tommaso Sanna,
Leonarda Galiuto,
Giampaolo Niccoli,
Filippo Crea
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european heart journal acute cardiovascular care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.42
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 2048-8734
pISSN - 2048-8726
DOI - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab028
Subject(s) - medicine , preload , ejection fraction , cardiology , odds ratio , confidence interval , logistic regression , heart failure , cardiac catheterization , blood pressure , diastole , hemodynamics
Aims Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is associated to serious adverse in-hospital complications. We evaluated the role of invasively assessed left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) for predicting in-hospital complications in TTS patients compared to the most widely used echocardiographic parameters of ventricular function. Methods and Results  We prospectively enrolled 130 patients (mean age 71.2 ± 11.3 years, 114 [87.7%] female) with TTS. Invasive measurement of LVEDP was performed at the time of cardiac catheterization. The rate of in-hospital complications (composite of acute heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmias and all-cause death) was examined. In-hospital complications occurred in 37 (28.5%) patients. Patients who experienced in-hospital complications had a higher prevalence of neurological trigger and lower prevalence of emotional trigger, higher LVEDP and mean E/e′ ratio and lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF) values compared to those who did not experience in-hospital complications. At multivariate logistic regression, higher LVEDP [odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05–1.20], P < 0.001] and lower LVEF (OR 0.95, 95% CI [0.91–0.99], P = 0.011) remained independently predictors of in-hospital complications, while emotional trigger was associated to a lower risk (OR 0.24, 95% CI [0.06–0.96], P = 0.044). The area under the curve (AUC) for LEVDP in the prediction of in-hospital events was 0.776 (95% CI [0.69–0.86], P <0.001, with a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 58% using a LVEDP cut-off value of 22.5 mmHg). The AUC was significantly higher for LVEDP than for E/e′ ratio (P = 0.037). Conclusions  LVEDP measured at the time of catheterization may help in identifying TTS patients at higher risk of cardiovascular deterioration with relevant therapeutic implications.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom