The Argument for a Constitutional Right to Communication and Language
Author(s) -
L. Siegel
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the journal of deaf studies and deaf education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.862
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1465-7325
pISSN - 1081-4159
DOI - 10.1093/deafed/7.3.258
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , psychology , constitution , democracy , sign language , linguistics , law , political science , politics , medicine , philosophy
The need for and right to communication and language is fundamental to the human condition. Without communication, an individual cannot become an effective and productive adult or an informed citizen in our democracy. The importance of communication and language for deaf and hard-of-hearing children is so basic as to be beyond debate. Given the historic difficulties deaf and hard-of-hearing children face, their compromised communication and language skills and the educational, social, cognitive, and psychological consequences, this note contends that a constitutional right to communication is both necessary and legally sound. The right to assemble and to vote, the right to equal protection under the law must be extended to the right of deaf and hard-of-hearing children to full communication development and access. If the Constitution venerates the right to speech, the right to communication and language is of equal or greater value.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom