z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
International comparison of bank fraud reimbursement: customer perceptions and contractual terms
Author(s) -
Ingolf Becker,
Alice Hutchings,
Ruba Abu-Salma,
Ross Anderson,
Nicholas Bohm,
Steven J. Murdoch,
M. Angela Sasse,
Gianluca Stringhini
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of cybersecurity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.438
H-Index - 16
ISSN - 2057-2093
DOI - 10.1093/cybsec/tyx011
Subject(s) - reimbursement , perception , business , meaning (existential) , accounting , identification (biology) , marketing , actuarial science , public relations , psychology , law , political science , health care , botany , neuroscience , psychotherapist , biology
We set out to investigate how customers comprehend bank terms and conditions (TC in some cases they differ by product type, and advice can even be contradictory. While many banks allow customers to write PINs down as long as they are disguised and not kept with the card, 20% of banks do not allow PINs to be written down at all, and a handful do not allow PINs to be shared between accounts. We test our findings on 151 participants in Germany, the US and UK. They mostly agree: only 35% fully understand the T&Cs, and 28% find that sections are unclear. There are strong regional variations: Germans find their T&Cs particularly hard to understand, but Americans assume harsher T&Cs than they actually are, and tend to be reassured when they actually read them.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom