English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background and Aims Histological remission has arisen as the optimal treatment outcome in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the diagnostic performance of the noninvasive fecal biomarkers calprotectin (FC) and lactoferrin (FL) compared to the histological indices Nancy Index (NI) and Riley Index (RI). Methods This study is a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study based on secondary analysis of patient data from 2002 to 2017 extracted from medical registries of our clinics in Essen-Mitte, Germany. Patients with UC underwent a colonoscopy, with biopsies taken from the rectum and the sigmoid scored by 2 experienced pathologists according to NI and RI and provided a stool sample within 7 days pre- or post-colonoscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of recommended cutoffs for FC (&amp;gt;50 μg/g) and FL (≥7.25 μg/g) were tested against our reference standard (NI ≥2) in terms of specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy (effectiveness). Results The number of patients with UC recruited was n = 226, aged 45.2 (SD 13.3). Histological indices were highly correlated (r = 0.980, P &amp;lt; 0.001). Fecal biomarkers correlated moderately with NI (FC: r = 0.383, P &amp;lt; 0.001; FL: r = 0.420, P &amp;lt; 0.001) and RI (FC: r = 0.395, P &amp;lt; 0.001; FL: r = 0.424, P &amp;lt; 0.001). Fecal biomarker concentrations were increased in patients with active histological disease (NI ≥2), median [IQR], FC 69.72 [20.07–254.38], FL 18.59 [6.06–44.42], compared to those with inactive disease (NI ≤1), FC 12.35 [3.89 – 32.16], FL 3.14 [0.75–11.05], z = −6.60, P &amp;lt; 0.001. Fecal biomarker concentrations differed significantly across NI grades 0–4 (FC: H4 = 45.2; FL: H4 = 47.5, both P &amp;lt; 0.001). Patients with grade 0 had significantly lower concentrations of fecal biomarkers than those with grade 3 (median; FC 10.94 vs 72.22; FL 2.30 vs 29.10; both P &amp;lt; 0.001) or grade 4 (FC 10.94 vs 67.00; FL 2.30 vs 27.64; both P &amp;lt; 0.001), as well as grade 2 for FC only (10.94 vs 56.22, P = 0.001). Concentrations were also lower in patients with grade 1 compared to those with grade 3 (FC 17.49 vs 72.22; FL 4.24 vs. 29.10; both P ≤ 0.001) or grade 4 (FC 17.49 vs 67.00; FL 4.24 vs 27.64; both P &amp;lt; 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics area under the curve showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for both FC 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.83) and FL 0.73 (95% CI 0.66–0.80). Optimized cutoffs for both FC (≥34.29) and FL (≥5.85 μg/g) had slightly improved accuracy, compared with the manufacturer’s cutoffs (FC: 69.9% vs 65.9%; FL: 71.7% vs 69.0%). Conclusions Fecal biomarkers calprotectin and lactoferrin correlate with histological disease activity and differentiate between patients in histological remission from those with evidence of moderate to severe disease activity. Their noninvasiveness, in addition to being inexpensive, supports their use in the clinical monitoring of patients with UC.

crohn's and colitis 360

Assessing Histological Inflammatory Activity in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study Testing Fecal Biomarkers Lactoferrin and Calprotectin