z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Differences in Depredation by Small Predators Limit the Use of Plasticine and Zebra Finch Eggs in Artificial-Nest Studies
Author(s) -
Thomas Maier,
Richard M. DeGraaf
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
ornithological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1938-5129
pISSN - 0010-5422
DOI - 10.1093/condor/103.1.180
Subject(s) - passerine , zebra finch , plasticine , taeniopygia , sparrow , biology , predation , zoology , plumage , altricial , nest (protein structural motif) , ecology , kestrel , neuroscience , petrology , geology , biochemistry
Small mammals, such as mice and voles, have been implicated as major egg predators of Neotropical migrant passerines by field studies using soft plasticine eggs or the very small eggs of Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Nevertheless, the effort required to depredate these commonly used egg surrogates may be less than that required to depredate the larger, thicker-shelled eggs of most passerine species. To compare the depredation of these surrogates to that of the eggs of a mid-sized passerine by a ubiquitous small predator, we exposed dissimilar pairs of plasticine, Zebra Finch, and House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) eggs to captive white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Plasticine eggs were marked by mice more than either kind of real egg, and Zebra Finch eggs were breached more often than House Sparrow eggs. We conclude that the use of either plasticine or Zebra Finch eggs may lead to overestimation of the ability or proclivity of small mammals to actually depredate the eggs of most passerines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom