Increased Risk of Infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Among Uncircumcised Men Presenting with Genital Ulcer Disease in Kenya
Author(s) -
Mark Tyndall,
Allan Ronald,
E. Agoki,
W. Malisa,
J Bwayo,
J O Ndinya-Achola,
Samuel Moses,
Francis A. Plummer
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/clinids/23.3.449
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , genital ulcer , confidence interval , logistic regression , population , sexually transmitted disease , sex organ , demography , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , immunology , environmental health , syphilis , sociology , biology , genetics
The factors responsible for the explosive spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in sub-Saharan Africa continue to be identified and debated. One of the most controversial factors has been male circumcision. This cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the association between circumcision status and infection with HIV-1 among men with genital ulcer disease. Eight hundred and ten men participated in the study, of whom 190 (23%) were HIV-1-positive. A logistic regression model adjusted for behavioral and historical showed that HIV-1 positivity was independently associated with being uncircumcised (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-7.2) and with a history of urethral discharge (adjusted OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8). This association could not be explained by measures of sexual exposure to HIV-1 among this population. Male circumcision should be considered as an intervention strategy for AIDS control.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom