z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quantitative Determination of Vapor-Phase Compound A in Sevoflurane Anesthesia Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
Author(s) -
MariePaule Bouche,
Jan F. P. Van Bocxlaer,
G Rolly,
L Versichelen,
Michel Struys,
Éric Mortier,
A.P. De Leenheer
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
clinical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.705
H-Index - 218
eISSN - 1530-8561
pISSN - 0009-9147
DOI - 10.1093/clinchem/47.2.281
Subject(s) - chromatography , mass spectrometry , sevoflurane , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , chemistry , gas chromatography , vapor phase , gas phase , analytical chemistry (journal) , anesthesia , medicine , organic chemistry , physics , thermodynamics
Background: During low-flow or closed-circuit anesthesia with the fluorinated inhalation anesthetic sevoflurane, compound A, an olefinic degradation product with known nephrotoxicity in rats, is generated on contact with alkaline CO2 adsorbents. To evaluate compound A formation and thus potential sevoflurane toxicity, a reliable and reproducible assay for quantitative vapor-phase compound A determination was developed. Methods: Compound A concentrations were measured by fully automated capillary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with cryofocusing. Calibrators of compound A in the vapor phase were prepared from liquid volumetric dilutions of stock solutions of compound A and sevoflurane in ethyl acetate. 1,1,1-Trifluoro-2-iodoethane was chosen as an internal standard. The resulting quantitative method was fully validated. Results: A linear response over a clinically useful concentration interval (0.3–75 μL/L) was obtained. Specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy conformed with current analytical requirements. The CVs were 4.1–10%, the limit of detection was 0.1 μL/L, and the limit of quantification was 0.3 μL/L. Analytical recoveries were 100.6% ± 10.1%, 102.5% ± 7.3%, and 99.0% ± 4.1% at 0.5, 10, and 75 μL/L, respectively. The method described was used to determine compound A concentrations during simulated closed-circuit conditions. Some of the resulting data are included, illustrating the practical applicability of the proposed analytical approach. Conclusions: A simple, fully automated, and reliable quantitative analytical method for determination of compound A in air was developed. A solution was established for sampling, calibration, and chromatographic separation of volatiles in an area complicated by limited availability of sample volume and low concentrations of the analyte.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom