An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research
Author(s) -
Nicholas C. Chesnaye,
Vianda S Stel,
Giovanni Tripepi,
Friedo W. Dekker,
Edouard L. Fu,
Carmine Zoccali,
Kitty J. Jager
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical kidney journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.033
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 2048-8513
pISSN - 2048-8505
DOI - 10.1093/ckj/sfab158
Subject(s) - propensity score matching , inverse probability , observational study , confounding , weighting , inverse probability weighting , censoring (clinical trials) , statistics , inverse , population , econometrics , marginal structural model , computer science , mathematics , medicine , posterior probability , environmental health , bayesian probability , geometry , radiology
In this article we introduce the concept of inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and describe how this method can be applied to adjust for measured confounding in observational research, illustrated by a clinical example from nephrology. IPTW involves two main steps. First, the probability—or propensity—of being exposed to the risk factor or intervention of interest is calculated, given an individual’s characteristics (i.e. propensity score). Second, weights are calculated as the inverse of the propensity score. The application of these weights to the study population creates a pseudopopulation in which confounders are equally distributed across exposed and unexposed groups. We also elaborate on how weighting can be applied in longitudinal studies to deal with informative censoring and time-dependent confounding in the setting of treatment-confounder feedback.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom