Ribavirin and Interferon Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Multicenter Observational Study
Author(s) -
Yaseen M. Arabi,
Sarah Shalhoub,
Yasser Mandourah,
Fahad Al-Hameed,
Awad AlOmari,
Eman Al Qasim,
Jesna Jose,
Basem Alraddadi,
Abdullah Almotairi,
Kasim Al Khatib,
Ahmed Abdulmomen,
Ismael Qushmaq,
Anees Sindi,
Ahmed Mady,
Othman Solaiman,
Rajaa AlRaddadi,
Khalid Maghrabi,
Ahmed Ragab,
Ghaleb A. Al Mekhlafi,
Hanan H. Balkhy,
Abdulrahman Al Harthy,
Ayman Kharaba,
Jawaher Gramish,
Abdulsalam M. AlAithan,
Abdulaziz AlDawood,
Laura Merson,
Frederick G. Hayden,
Robert Fowler
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciz544
Subject(s) - medicine , ribavirin , middle east respiratory syndrome , marginal structural model , odds ratio , intensive care unit , confounding , hazard ratio , confidence interval , immunology , covid-19 , hepatitis c virus , virus , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ribavirin and recombinant interferon (RBV/rIFN) therapy on the outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), accounting for time-varying confounders. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed MERS from 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia diagnosed between September 2012 and January 2018. We evaluated the association of RBV/rIFN with 90-day mortality and MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) RNA clearance using marginal structural modeling to account for baseline and time-varying confounders. Results Of 349 MERS patients, 144 (41.3%) patients received RBV/rIFN (RBV and/or rIFN-α2a, rIFN-α2b, or rIFN-β1a; none received rIFN-β1b). RBV/rIFN was initiated at a median of 2 days (Q1, Q3: 1, 3 days) from intensive care unit admission. Crude 90-day mortality was higher in patients with RBV/rIFN compared to no RBV/rIFN (106/144 [73.6%] vs 126/205 [61.5%]; P = .02]. After adjusting for baseline and time-varying confounders using a marginal structural model, RBV/rIFN was not associated with changes in 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .73–1.44]; P = .87) or with more rapid MERS-CoV RNA clearance (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, .30–1.44]; P = .29). Conclusions In this observational study, RBV/rIFN (RBV and/or rIFN-α2a, rIFN-α2b, or rIFN-β1a) therapy was commonly used in critically ill MERS patients but was not associated with reduction in 90-day mortality or in faster MERS-CoV RNA clearance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom