English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

TO THE EDITOR—We read with great interest the article by Bouza and colleagues on enterococcal bacteremia and the NOVA (Number of positive blood cultures, Origin of the bacteremia, previous Valve disease , Auscultation of heart murmur) score. The authors proposed a simple clinical score to rule out infective endo-carditis (IE) among patients with entero-coccal bloodstream infection and thus reduce the need for transesophageal echo-cardiography (TEE) [1]. Given the high morbidity and mortality of enterococcal IE but also the rarity of IE in patients experiencing enterococcal bacteremia, we think it is of paramount importance to help physicians decide on the need for echocardiography in such situations. The authors should be commended for their work, which seeks to improve patient care, and for their active intervention in their hospital. Whereas we agree with Bouza's objectives , we have some unresolved questions about a few points of the study. First, it is unclear what data were used to calculate the proportion of the 1515 patients who did have transthoracic echocardiography. Recalculation of this proportion does not seem possible to us, as it appears as if some IE cases did not in fact undergo echo-cardiography. We think that a description of the Duke criteria, which were applied to classify the 65 definite IE cases, would have been of interest to the readers. Second, the authors did not address the problem of overlap that might exist between predictor variables and their primary endpoint definition. Some independent predictors of IE that composed the NOVA score (such as heart murmur, previous valve disease, persistent bacteremia) are part of the endpoint definition—all count as Duke-Li minor or major criteria and thus far are overrepresented in IE cases. Consequently, the predictors may have been found to be associated with IE because " controls were selected from among patients with enterococcal bacter-emia, negative TEE results and no criteria for IE according to the modified Duke criteria. " We think that a sensitivity analysis would have made the results more convincing. One possible approach to avoid this limitation would be to exclude all enterococcal IE cases that are definite IE and whose confirmed classification was based on the presence of Duke-Li criteria that were included in the statistical model as potential predictors of IE. Finally, we believe it is of importance to have a clear definition of the " unknown origin of the bacteremia " item in order to apply the …

Echocardiography in Patients With Enterococcal Bacteremia