z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to Biteker et al
Author(s) -
Catherine Chirouze,
François Alla,
Bruno Hoen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/civ055
Subject(s) - medicine
TO THE EDITOR—We thank Biteker et al for their comments [1]. Our study was not designed to determine the best timing of surgery in Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Let us specify that we did not evaluate the benefit of surgery performed in the first 7 days of antibiotic therapy. We defined “early valve surgery” as a valve surgery performed during the hospital stay for infective endocarditis, according to the definition used in the most recent studies on this subject. We showed that in the postoperative period (7 days), the potential benefit of surgery was counterbalanced by the postoperative mortality. Our objective was to study the benefit of surgery in terms of mortality in S. aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. We did not study the factors associated with outcome (eg, vegetation sizes).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom