z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
High Percentage of False-Positive Results for Influenza B Obtained With a Rapid Influenza Point-of-Care Test
Author(s) -
Nicole M. Iovine,
Tracy Ison,
Antony Payton,
J. Glenn Morris,
Kenneth H. Rand
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciu315
Subject(s) - medicine , point of care testing , test (biology) , virology , point of care , influenzavirus b , orthomyxoviridae , immunology , influenza a virus , pathology , virus , paleontology , biology
The monthly mean percent positivites for B were 27%, 26%, 29%, and 49% for September, October, November, and December 2013, respectively. We observed 55% positivity for B in January 2014 and 58% for the first 2 weeks of February. Because these percentages were much greater than the national average of <4% [2], we compared the results obtained with the POCT to those obtained with the eSensor respiratory viral panel (RVP; GenMarkDx, Carlsbad, CA). This test distinguishes influenza A subtypes, including the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1), from nonpandemic H1N1 and H3N2, as well as influenza B and several other common respiratory viruses. When the POCT yielded a positive result for influenza A or B, a second specimen was immediately obtained and analyzed using the RVP. We compared 43 POCT A/RVP paired specimens and 66 POCTB/RVPpaired specimens (Figure 1). For influenza A, 93% of those samples were identified as pH1N1 by our RVP. Seven percent were negative for any

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom