English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The monthly mean percent positivites for B were 27%, 26%, 29%, and 49% for September, October, November, and December 2013, respectively. We observed 55% positivity for B in January 2014 and 58% for the first 2 weeks of February. Because these percentages were much greater than the national average of <4% [2], we compared the results obtained with the POCT to those obtained with the eSensor respiratory viral panel (RVP; GenMarkDx, Carlsbad, CA). This test distinguishes influenza A subtypes, including the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1), from nonpandemic H1N1 and H3N2, as well as influenza B and several other common respiratory viruses. When the POCT yielded a positive result for influenza A or B, a second specimen was immediately obtained and analyzed using the RVP. We compared 43 POCT A/RVP paired specimens and 66 POCTB/RVPpaired specimens (Figure 1). For influenza A, 93% of those samples were identified as pH1N1 by our RVP. Seven percent were negative for any

High Percentage of False-Positive Results for Influenza B Obtained With a Rapid Influenza Point-of-Care Test