Impact of the Type of Diagnostic Assay on Clostridium difficile Infection and Complication Rates in a Mandatory Reporting Program
Author(s) -
Yves Longtin,
Sylvie Trottier,
Gilles Brochu,
Bianka Paquet-Bolduc,
Christophe Garenc,
Vilayvong Loungnarath,
Catherine Beaulieu,
Danielle Goulet,
Jean Longtin
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/cis840
Subject(s) - medicine , clostridium difficile , incidence (geometry) , confidence interval , gastroenterology , complication , rate ratio , univariate analysis , poisson regression , surgery , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , multivariate analysis , biology , population , physics , optics , environmental health
Most Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) surveillance programs neither specify the diagnostic method to be used nor stratify rates accordingly. We assessed the difference in healthcare-associated CDI (HA-CDI) incidence and complication rates obtained by 2 validated diagnostic methods.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom