HIV and Cardiovascular Disease
Author(s) -
Samuel A. Bozzette
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/cir275
Subject(s) - medicine , disease , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , virology , intensive care medicine
Over the past decade, there has been great interest in the relationships around the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cardiovascular disease. Indeed, a recent major subject heading search in PubMed using the search terms ‘‘HIV Infections’’ and (‘‘Cardiovascular Diseases’’ or ‘‘Cerebrovascular Disorders’’) yielded nearly 3000 articles. A review of this vast and often confusing literature is beyond the scope of this piece, but summaries are available [1]. Some things are relatively clear. Cardiovascular disease is an increasingly important cause of death in patients with HIV as rates of HIV-related opportunistic infections and cancers decrease, but the absolute rate of myocardial infarction within age cohorts does not seem to be rising. Those infected with HIV have an elevated risk of vascular disease that manifests in a number of ways, the most clinically prominent being a high rate of myocardial infarction and probably stroke. The mechanisms for this include both direct effects of HIV infection and conventional risk factors such as hyperlipidemia, some of which may be exacerbated by HIV infection and its treatment. The role of treatment is complex, with most studies suggesting a modest relationship between duration of protease inhibitors in particular and risk of myocardial infarction at the same time that strong data suggest that treatment reduces overall risk of disease. The situation is more complex with abacavir, where some observational studies show an increased risk from short-term but not long-term use. Such findings in the setting of multiple hypothesis testing should be interpreted with caution, especially as pooled randomized trials do not show this effect. The paper by Bedimo and colleagues in this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases is one of several outcome-based cohort studies published from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System [2]. The authors have elected to concentrate on myocardial infarction per se and stroke. The strengths of this work relative to other cohort studies include the large patient population and the availability of laboratory data while the weaknesses include the need to rely on administrative data for diagnoses of endpoints and certain risk factors (eg, smoking) as well as a relatively short median follow-up period. In the survival analysis, the hazard ratio for both myocardial infarction and stroke was significantly higher for patients receiving less effective mono and dual antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens, nonsignificantly higher for patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including abacavir, and not elevated for persons on other HAART regimens. The addition of covariates had only a small effect on these hazard ratios, suggesting little confounding, but the large hazard ratios for these conventional risk factors reinforce their importance. The analysis of current therapy showed that, compared with current use of tenofovir, current use of abacavir was associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction and stroke as well as with chronic kidney disease. Though chronic kidney disease was also strongly associated with myocardial infarction and stroke, adjustment for this factor again made little difference to effect sizes. However, the hazard ratios were of interest. Regimens containing abacavir had the highest hazard ratios for myocardial infarction and stroke, regimens containing tenofovir had the lowest hazard ratios, and regimens containing both had intermediate hazard ratios. However, all the hazard ratios were significantly lower compared with the group receiving no therapy or regimens containing neither abacavir nor tenofovir. It is perhaps unfortunate that neither direct comparisons of abacavir vs tenofovir–containing regimens Received 17 March 2011; accepted 20 March 2011. Correspondence: Samuel A. Bozzette, MD, The RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407 (sbozzette@ucsd.edu). Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;53(1):92–93 The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals. permissions@oup.com. 1058-4838/2011/531-0015$14.00 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir275
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom