Symptoms and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Positivity in the General Population in the United Kingdom
Author(s) -
Karina-Doris Vihta,
Koen B. Pouwels,
Tim Peto,
Emma Pritchard,
David W. Eyre,
Thomas House,
Owen Gethings,
Ruth Studley,
Emma Rourke,
Duncan Cook,
Ian Diamond,
Derrick W. Crook,
Philippa C. Matthews,
Nicole Stoesser,
A. Sarah Walker,
Tina Thomas,
Daniel Ayoubkhani,
Russell Black,
Antonio Felton,
Megan Crees,
Joel W. Jones,
Lina Lloyd,
E. R. Sunderland,
Jia Wei,
Alison Howarth,
George Doherty,
James Kavanagh,
Kevin Chau,
Sarah Cameron,
Phoebe Tamblin-Hopper,
Magda Wolna,
Brent Brown,
Stephanie B. Hatch,
Daniel Ebner,
Lucas Martins Ferreira,
Thomas Christott,
Brian D. Marsden,
Wanwisa Dejnirattisai,
Juthathip Mongkolsapaya,
Sarah Hoosdally,
Richard J. Cornall,
David I. Stuart,
E. Yvonne Jones,
Gavin Screaton,
Katrina Lythgoe,
David Bonsall,
Tanya Golubchik,
Helen Fryer,
John I. Bell,
John Newton,
Julie V. Robotham,
Paul Birrell,
Helena Jordan,
Tim Sheppard,
Graham Athey,
Dan Moody,
Leigh Curry,
Pamela Brereton,
Jodie Hay,
Harper Van Steenhouse,
Anna Godsmark,
George Morris,
Bobby Mallick,
Phil Eeles,
Stuart Cox,
Kevin Paddon,
Tim James,
Jessica Lee
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciab945
Subject(s) - medicine , false positive paradox , sore throat , real time polymerase chain reaction , population , pediatrics , immunology , environmental health , biology , biochemistry , machine learning , computer science , gene
Background “Classic” symptoms (cough, fever, loss of taste/smell) prompt severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in the United Kingdom. Studies have assessed the ability of different symptoms to identify infection, but few have compared symptoms over time (reflecting variants) and by vaccination status. Methods Using the COVID-19 Infection Survey, sampling households across the United Kingdom, we compared symptoms in PCR-positives vs PCR-negatives, evaluating sensitivity of combinations of 12 symptoms (percentage symptomatic PCR-positives reporting specific symptoms) and tests per case (TPC) (PCR-positives or PCR-negatives reporting specific symptoms/ PCR-positives reporting specific symptoms). Results Between April 2020 and August 2021, 27 869 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive episodes occurred in 27 692 participants (median 42 years), of whom 13 427 (48%) self-reported symptoms (“symptomatic PCR-positives”). The comparator comprised 3 806 692 test-negative visits (457 215 participants); 130 612 (3%) self-reported symptoms (“symptomatic PCR-negatives”). Symptom reporting in PCR-positives varied by age, sex, and ethnicity, and over time, reflecting changes in prevalence of viral variants, incidental changes (eg, seasonal pathogens (with sore throat increasing in PCR-positives and PCR-negatives from April 2021), schools reopening) and vaccination rollout. After May 2021 when Delta emerged, headache and fever substantially increased in PCR-positives, but not PCR-negatives. Sensitivity of symptom-based detection increased from 74% using “classic” symptoms, to 81% adding fatigue/weakness, and 90% including all 8 additional symptoms. However, this increased TPC from 4.6 to 5.3 to 8.7. Conclusions Expanded symptom combinations may provide modest benefits for sensitivity of PCR-based case detection, but this will vary between settings and over time, and increases tests/case. Large-scale changes to targeted PCR-testing approaches require careful evaluation given substantial resource and infrastructure implications.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom