Ultrasound-Guided Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling: A Minimally Invasive Autopsy Strategy During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil, 2020
Author(s) -
Amaro Nunes DuarteNeto,
Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva,
Renata Aparecida de Almeida Monteiro,
Jair Theodoro Filho,
Thábata Larissa Luciano Ferreira Leite,
Catia Sales de Moura,
Michele Soares GomesGouvêa,
João Renato Rebello Pinho,
Cristina Takami Kanamura,
Ellen Pierre de Oliveria,
Kely Cristina Soares Bispo,
Cássia Arruda,
Aline Brito dos Santos,
Flavia Cristina Gonçalves de Aquino,
Élia Garcia Caldini,
Thaís Mauad,
Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva,
Marisa Dolhnikoff
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciab885
Subject(s) - medicine , pandemic , covid-19 , pathology , autopsy , infectious disease (medical specialty) , disease
Background Minimally invasive autopsies, also known as minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), have proven to be an alternative to complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs) in places or situations where this procedure cannot be performed. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, CDAs were suspended by March 2020 in Brazil to reduce biohazard. To contribute to the understanding of COVID-19 pathology, we have conducted ultrasound (US)–guided MITS as a strategy. Methods This case series study includes 80 autopsies performed in patients with COVID-19 confirmed by laboratorial tests. Different organs were sampled using a standardized MITS protocol. Tissues were submitted to histopathological analysis as well as immunohistochemical and molecular analysis and electron microscopy in selected cases. Results US-guided MITS proved to be a safe and highly accurate procedure; none of the personnel were infected, and accuracy ranged from 69.1% for kidney, up to 90.1% for lungs, and reaching 98.7% and 97.5% for liver and heart, respectively. US-guided MITS provided a systemic view of the disease, describing the most common pathological findings and identifying viral and other infectious agents using ancillary techniques, and also allowed COVID-19 diagnosis confirmation in 5% of the cases that were negative in premortem and postmortem nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Conclusions Our data showed that US-guided MITS has the capacity similar to CDA not only to identify but also to characterize emergent diseases.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom