z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Predictors of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Following High-Risk Exposure
Author(s) -
Kristin L. Andrejko,
Jake M. Pry,
Jennifer F. Myers,
John J. Openshaw,
James Watt,
Nozomi Birkett,
Jennifer L. DeGuzman,
Camilla M. Barbaduomo,
Zheng Dong,
Anna T. Fang,
Paulina M. Frost,
Timothy Ho,
Mahsa Javadi,
Sophia S. Li,
Vivian Tran,
Christine Wan,
Seema Jain,
Joseph A. Lewnard,
Helia Samani,
Nikolina Walas,
Erin Xavier,
Diana J Poindexter,
Najla Dabbagh,
Michelle M Spinosa,
Shrey Saretha,
Adrian F Cornejo,
Hyemin Park,
Miriam I. Bermejo,
Amanda Yun Rui Lam,
Amandeep Kaur,
Ashly Dyke,
Diana Felipe,
Maya Spencer,
Savannah Corredor,
Yasmine Abdulrahim
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciab1040
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , confidence interval , logistic regression , case control study , conditional logistic regression , odds
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are recommended for COVID-19 prevention. However, the effectiveness of NPIs in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission remains poorly quantified. Methods We conducted a test-negative design case-control study enrolling cases (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and controls (testing negative) with molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results reported to California Department of Public Health between 24 February–12 November, 2021. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of case status among participants who reported contact with an individual known or suspected to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (“high-risk exposure”) ≤14 days before testing. Results 751 of 1448 cases (52%) and 255 of 1443 controls (18%) reported high-risk exposures ≤14 days before testing. Adjusted odds of case status were 3.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.75–5.22) higher when high-risk exposures occurred with household members (vs. other contacts), 2.10-fold (1.05–4.21) higher when exposures occurred indoors (vs. outdoors only), and 2.15-fold (1.27–3.67) higher when exposures lasted ≥3 hours (vs. shorter durations) among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated individuals; excess risk associated with such exposures was mitigated among fully-vaccinated individuals. Cases were less likely than controls to report mask usage during high-risk exposures (aOR = 0.50 [0.29–0.85]). The adjusted odds of case status was lower for fully-vaccinated (aOR = 0.25 [0.15–0.43]) participants compared to unvaccinated participants. Benefits of mask usage were greatest among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated participants, and in interactions involving non-household contacts or interactions occurring without physical contact. Conclusions NPIs reduced the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Vaccine effectiveness was substantial for partially and fully vaccinated persons.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom