z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Gas Chromatography Problem Solving and Troubleshooting
Author(s) -
Dean Rood
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of chromatographic science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.362
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1945-239X
pISSN - 0021-9665
DOI - 10.1093/chromsci/43.6.329
Subject(s) - chemistry , troubleshooting , chromatography , gas chromatography , computer science , operating system
Question: My flame-ionization detector (FID) goes out about 1.5 min after I make a sample injection. It occurs for the samples in water, but not for the ones in methanol. How do I prevent the flame from being extinguished? Is the water damaging my FID? Answer: There is no damage to the FID, but the large amount of water is extinguishing the flame. Unfortunately, there is little that can be done to consistently avoid this problem. Decreasing the injection volume is one possible solution. This approach is most successful for Megabore direct, splitless, and on-column injections because these deposit large volumes of the injection solvent into the column. Another technique is to add enough methanol to the aqueous sample to create a final methanol concentration of 10-20%. As long as the column does not separate the water and methanol, the presence of flammable methanol may prevent the flame from going out. Obviously, this technique is not suitable if sample dilution or alteration is not possible. Sometimes, increasing the hydrogen flow to the FID by 5-Ί 0 mL/min may prevent the flame from going out. It may be more difficult to light the FID flame if the hydrogen flow is changed by more than 10 mL/min. Finally, installing a retention gap or guard column may help (1). Upon installing a new capillary column, some peaks exhibited tailing that was not present for previous columns of the same description. After checking the GC and conditions for possible changes, none were noted. However, I noticed that the color of the new column was lighter than the previous ones. Is it possible that I received the wrong column or that the lighter tubing is responsible for the increase in peak tailing? Answer: The color of the column has no effect on the chromatographic performance. The color is determined by the polyimide coating on the outside of the fused-silica tubing. The chromatography occurs inside of the tubing, thus any chromatographic differences cannot be attributed to the outside of the column. It is just a coincidence that the problem occured with a lighter colored column. The increased peak tailing is due to an undetected system problem, accidental contamination of the new column, or a normal variation in the activity level of columns from this specific manufacturer. Any changes in retention, peak shape or width, or separation cannot be correlated to the color of the column. Differences …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom