z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences
Author(s) -
Emma Molyneaux,
Norha Vera San Juan,
Penelope Brown,
Brynmor LloydEvans,
Siân Oram
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the british journal of social work
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.95
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1468-263X
pISSN - 0045-3102
DOI - 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111
Subject(s) - mental health , thematic analysis , agency (philosophy) , protocol (science) , work (physics) , service (business) , psychology , public relations , sustainability , medical education , mental health service , nursing , qualitative research , medicine , business , political science , engineering , sociology , psychiatry , marketing , social science , mechanical engineering , ecology , alternative medicine , pathology , biology
Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom