222 Robotic Surgery: Public Perceptions and Current Misconceptions
Author(s) -
S. Arshad,
Gagandeep Brar,
Shiyu Xu,
N. Ramesh,
K. Talajia,
Mehreen Anwar,
Anne ter Wal
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1093/bjs/znac040.020
Subject(s) - thematic analysis , likert scale , medicine , descriptive statistics , perception , medical education , public health , scale (ratio) , qualitative research , nursing , psychology , social science , developmental psychology , statistics , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , sociology
Aim While surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of Robotic Surgery (RS), the public's role is often overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. This study aims to identify public understanding, opinions and misconceptions on RS and present solutions to facilitate its wider integration. Method An online questionnaire distributed via social media platforms between February and May 2021 identified the views of UK adults on RS. The data was evaluated using thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, and statistical analysis. Statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field were also sought. Results 263 responses were obtained, with 216 (82.1%) analysed. Demographic differences provided significantly different results. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00–6.00) on a 10-point likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions on what RS entails, including it being autonomous. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p=<0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Conclusions This study highlights the role of negative and inaccurate public perceptions surrounding RS in impeding its widespread adoption. Greater emphasis must be placed on patient education in RS to mitigate misconceptions and ensure greater diffusion of its benefits
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom