TP10.1.5The reorganisation of Emergency General Surgery services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Outcomes of delayed presentation, mortality and BAME patients

Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency. The reconfiguration of local healthcare systems to accommodate the increase in Critical Care capacity has put strain on ‘non-COVID’ specialities. This study characterises the utilisation of Emergency General Surgery (EGS) services at a busy UK university teaching hospital during the COVID-19 lockdown period to evaluate outcomes and to identify patient groups with worse outcomes. Method This retrospective study compares EGS admissions during the UK’s lockdown period (23rd March-28th May 2020) to the same period in 2019. Patient demographics were recorded together with details of their hospital stay and treatment outcomes. Results A total of 645 patients were included, comprising 223 in the COVID-19 and 422 in the non-COVID-19 periods. There was no difference in age, sex, co-morbidity or socioeconomical status. A lower proportion of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) patients were admitted during the COVID-19 period (20.6% vs 35.4%, p < 0.05). The duration of symptoms prior to presentation were longer, and admission Early Warning Scores and serum inflammatory markers were higher. More patients present with acute kidney injury (9.9% vs 4.7%, p = 0.012). There was no difference in perioperative outcomes or 30-day mortality, but more patients were readmitted following conservative management (10.6% vs 4.7%, p = 0.023). Conclusion We show that the UK reorganisation of EGS services has been successful in terms of outcomes and access to services despite a more unwell population. There was a lower proportion of BAME admissions suggesting additional barriers to access to healthcare under pandemic lockdown conditions.