EP.TH.375Inguinal hernia repair: A systematic analysis of online patient information using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool
Author(s) -
Siobhan Chien,
Danielle Cunningham,
Khurram Khan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1093/bjs/znab309.049
Subject(s) - medicine , inguinal hernia , hernia , quality (philosophy) , hernia repair , general surgery , inguinal hernia surgery , patient education , population , groin , surgery , family medicine , philosophy , environmental health , epistemology
Aims Online resources are a fundamental source of healthcare information due to the increasing popularity of the Internet, therefore ensuring accuracy and reliability of websites is crucial to improving patient education and enhancing patient outcomes. Inguinal hernia repair is the most commonly performed general surgical procedure worldwide. This study aims to analyse the quality of online patient information on inguinal hernia repair using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patents (EQIP) tool. Method A systematic review of online information on inguinal hernia repair was conducted using 4 search terms: “inguinal hernia”, “groin hernia”, “inguinal hernia repair” and “inguinoscrotal hernia”. The top 100 websites for each term identified using Google were assessed using the modified EQIP tool (score 0-36). Websites for the paediatric population or intended for medical professional use were excluded from analysis. Results 142 websites were eligible for analysis. 52.8% of websites originated from the UK. The median EQIP score for all websites was 17/36 (IQR 14-21). The median EQIP scores for Content, Identification and Structure were 8/18, 2/8, and 8/12, respectively. Complications of inguinal hernia repair were included in 46.5% of websites, with 9.2% providing complication rates and 14.1% providing information on how complications are handled. Conclusions This study highlights that the current quality of online patient information on inguinal hernia repair is poor, with minimal information available on complications, hindering patients’ ability to make informed decisions regarding their healthcare. To improve patient education, there is an immediate need for improved quality online resources to meet international standards.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom