z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
EP.WE.628The Challenges of Consent and COVID-19: Analysis of Documentation of Risk of Hospital Acquired COVID-19 Infection in a District General Hospital
Author(s) -
Shashwat Mishra,
Heather Davis,
Wei Jian Tan,
Joanne Cooke
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1093/bjs/znab308.078
Subject(s) - medicine , documentation , covid-19 , informed consent , risk of infection , psychological intervention , pandemic , emergency medicine , retrospective cohort study , medical emergency , pediatrics , surgery , nursing , disease , alternative medicine , infectious disease (medical specialty) , pathology , biology , computer science , genetics , programming language
Aims The COVID-19 pandemic poses a new material risk to hospital admissions and we must modify consenting practice accordingly. This study assessed documentation of the risk of COVID-19 infection and associated morbidity in consenting practice for patients undergoing general surgical procedures under general anaesthesia at a district general hospital. Methods This is was a two-cycle study design. An initial retrospective case-note analysis of 41 inpatient consent forms and operation notes during April 2020 was performed. Data were gathered on points from the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidance, including documentation of risk of COVID-19 infection. Recommendations were then offered including a teaching session from the departmental lead into the importance of documenting risk of COVID-19 infection. A prospective case-note analysis of 45 inpatient consent forms and operation notes during November to December 2020 was then performed. Results In cycle one, of 41 cases, 39% (16) had risk of chest infection documented. Of these, 16 (63%) specified COVID-19 in risk documentation. Morbidity related to COVID-19 was documented in 4 (25%) of these 16 cases. Following interventions, of 45 cases, 93% had risk of COVID-19 infection and associated morbidity documented (χ2 = 89.3646, p < 0.00001 significant at p < 0.05). Conclusion We initially identified a deviation from RCS consent guidance. The second cycle results show a significant improvement in consenting practice for the risk of contracting COVID-19 for inpatient surgical procedures. We aim to further refine our recommendations to ensure that this material risk is communicated to patients during the initial consent process.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom