z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
1454 The Challenges of Consent and COVID-19: Analysis of Documentation of Risk of Hospital Acquired COVID-19 Infection in a District General Hospital
Author(s) -
Heather Davis,
Sujata Priyadarshini Mishra,
Joseph Cooke
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1093/bjs/znab259.161
Subject(s) - medicine , documentation , audit , medical record , pandemic , covid-19 , risk of infection , medical emergency , informed consent , risk assessment , medline , emergency medicine , family medicine , surgery , disease , alternative medicine , infectious disease (medical specialty) , pathology , management , computer security , biology , computer science , political science , law , economics , genetics , programming language
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has been a challenging time for society and raised further challenges for medical practice. It poses a new material risk to any hospital admission or procedure, and consenting practice must modify to accommodate this. Aim To assess the documentation of the risk of COVID-19 infection and associated morbidity in consenting practice, using the existing consent form as benchmark, for patient’s undergoing general surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. Method Retrospective case-note analysis of 41 general surgical inpatient consent forms and operation notes during April 2020. Data were gathered on multiple points mentioned in Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidance. This includes documentation of risk of COVID-19 infection, the patient’s diagnosis, other risk documentation, peri-operative lifestyle advice and likelihood of success. Results Of 41 cases, 16 (39%) had risk of chest infection documented. Of these 16, 10 (63%) specified COVID-19 in the risk documentation. Further, morbidity related to COVID-19 was documented in 4 out of 41 (10%) cases identified. Conclusions A material risk is classified as anything that poses substantial risk to a patient, and it is vital that they are made aware of this prior to undertaking any form of medical intervention. This study demonstrates deviation from RCS guidance, and the results have been discussed and distributed within the general surgical department. Advice has been communicated regarding improvements required in consenting practice from the clinical lead. We aim to re-audit practice in the coming months.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom