English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Generally, bottom-up and top-down are two complementary approaches for proteoforms identification. The inference of proteoforms relies on searching mass spectra against an accurate proteoform sequence database. A customized protein sequence database derived by RNA-Seq data can be used to better identify the proteoform existed in a studied species. However, the quality of sequences in customized databases which constructed by different strategies affect the performances of mass spectrometry (MS) identification. Additionally, performances of identifications between bottom-up and top-down using customized databases are also needed to be evaluated.

Evaluation of bottom-up and top-down mass spectrum identifications with different customized protein sequences databases