Prioritizing transcriptomic and epigenomic experiments using an optimization strategy that leverages imputed data

Successful science often involves not only performing experiments well, but also choosing well among many possible experiments. In a hypothesis generation setting, choosing an experiment well means choosing an experiment whose results are interesting or novel. In this work, we formalize this selection procedure in the context of genomics and epigenomics data generation. Specifically, we consider the task faced by a scientific consortium such as the National Institutes of Health ENCODE Consortium, whose goal is to characterize all of the functional elements in the human genome. Given a list of possible cell types or tissue types ('biosamples') and a list of possible high-throughput sequencing assays, where at least one experiment has been performed in each biosample and for each assay, we ask 'Which experiments should ENCODE perform next?'