z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparability of the Computerized Halstead Category Test with the Original Version
Author(s) -
Janice Nici,
Jim Hom
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
archives of clinical neuropsychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1873-5843
pISSN - 0887-6177
DOI - 10.1093/arclin/act075
Subject(s) - test (biology) , comparability , software portability , neuropsychology , neuropsychological test , pairwise comparison , psychology , computer science , artificial intelligence , medicine , machine learning , audiology , mathematics , psychiatry , programming language , cognition , paleontology , combinatorics , biology
The Halstead Category Test-Computer Version (HCT-CV) was developed with the goal of adapting the HCT to the computer while maintaining all essential features of the original test. We compared the HCT-CV results from clinical neuropsychological evaluations of 25 patients who were matched on a pairwise basis with 25 patients previously tested with the original version. Matching was done on age, education, and diagnosis. Results of group comparisons showed that the HCT-CV performed comparably with the original version, with mean score differences of <2 points. Correlations with the other subtests from the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery were also found to be comparable. Results suggest that the HCT-CV can be considered a satisfactory and comparable version of the HCT, while providing advantages in terms of ease of use and portability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom