A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Family Perceptions of Neuropsychological Evaluation and Resources for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors | Zendy

Emily L. Moscato | Zendy; Allison P. Fisher | Zendy; Lisa M. Gies | Zendy; Julia Smith-Paine | Zendy; Aimee E. Miley | Zendy; Dean W. Beebe | Zendy; Thea L. Quinton | Zendy; Ahna L. H. Pai | Zendy; Ralph Salloum | Zendy; Shari L. Wade | Zendy

Open Access

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Family Perceptions of Neuropsychological Evaluation and Resources for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

Author(s) -

Emily L. Moscato,

Allison P. Fisher,

Lisa M. Gies,

Julia Smith-Paine,

Aimee E. Miley,

Dean W. Beebe,

Thea L. Quinton,

Ahna L. H. Pai,

Ralph Salloum,

Shari L. Wade

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

archives of clinical neuropsychology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909

H-Index - 98

eISSN - 1873-5843

pISSN - 0887-6177

DOI - 10.1093/arclin/acab014

Subject(s) - neuropsychology , neurocognitive , psychology , clinical psychology , receipt , neuropsychological assessment , logistic regression , thematic analysis , neuropsychological testing , neuropsychological test , medicine , psychiatry , cognition , qualitative research , social science , sociology , world wide web , computer science

Neuropsychological testing is often recommended for pediatric brain tumor survivors, yet little is known about perceptions of testing and resources. The purpose of this study is to examine survivor and caregiver perceptions about neuropsychology and resources and identify factors associated with receipt of neuropsychological testing.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research