z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Valid Method for Comparing Rational and Empirical Heat Stress Indices
Author(s) -
Rick Brake,
Graham P Bates
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the annals of occupational hygiene
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1475-3162
pISSN - 0003-4878
DOI - 10.1093/annhyg/mef030
Subject(s) - heat stress , index (typography) , limiting , work (physics) , stress (linguistics) , econometrics , statistics , confusion , balance (ability) , mathematics , computer science , thermodynamics , engineering , psychology , mechanical engineering , physics , linguistics , philosophy , atmospheric sciences , neuroscience , world wide web , psychoanalysis
No single heat stress index has gained universal acceptance within the past 20 years, despite extensive research. It is currently difficult to directly and quantitatively compare the many rational and empirical indices that are available, which results in confusion and a reluctance to change to a different index. A method is developed using the concept of limiting metabolic rate, which allows virtually all heat stress indices to be compared with one another. Because all occupational heat stress indices are based, explicitly or implicitly, on the human heat balance equation, a unique value of metabolic rate can be found that just allows an unrestricted work/rest cycle in particular environmental conditions. A comparison using this methodology shows that there are very large differences between the recommended limits under the various indices, even for similar populations of acclimatized workers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom