z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Control of Cabbage Looper, Diamondback Moth, and Imported Cabbageworm on Cabbage with Mi-Crobial Insecticides, 1997
Author(s) -
James J. Linduska,
Marylee Ross,
Donna Baumann,
Annika Parr
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
arthropod management tests
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2155-9856
pISSN - 2155-9848
DOI - 10.1093/amt/23.1.78
Subject(s) - sprayer , biology , loam , horticulture , acre , cabbage looper , crop , insect , diamondback moth , agronomy , toxicology , larva , botany , pest analysis , soil water , ecology , trichoplusia , noctuidae , plutella
‘Bravo’ cabbage were planted in 35-ft-long 1-row plots on 19 Aug. Plants were spaced 22 inches apart in the row i with 72 inches between rows. The treatments were arranged in a RCB design with 3 replications. The soil was a Norfolk “A” loamy sand. All spray treatments were mixed in 2.0 gal of water and applied with a custom-built row crop sprayer. Each row was covered by 6 drop nozzles delivering 50 gal/acre at j 30 psi. Treatments were applied on 8, 15, and 22 Sep and 1, 7 Oct. Foliage injury was rated on 1-6 scale as follows: 1) no apparent insect feeding; 2) minor insect feeding on wrapper or outer leaves, 0-1% leaf area eaten; 3) moderate insect feeding on wrapper or outer leaves with no head damage, 2-leaf area eaten; 4) moderate insect feeding on wrapper or outer leaves with minor feeding on head, 6-10% leaf head unmarketable during normal marketing conditions; 5) moderate to heavy feeding on wrapper and head leaves and moderate number of feeding scars on head, 11-30% of leaf area eaten; 6) j considerable insect feeding on wrapper and head leaves with head having numerous feeding scars, over 30% of leaf area eaten.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom