English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

‘Bravo’ cabbage were planted in 1 row plots 35 ft. long on 31 Jul. Plants were spaced 22 inches apart in the row with 72 inches between rows. The treatments were arranged in a RCB design with 3 replications. The soil was a Norfolk “A” loamy sand. All spray treatments were mixed in 2.0 gal of water and applied with a custom-built row crop sprayer. Each row was covered by 6 drop nozzles delivering 50 gal/acre at 30 psi. Treatments were applied on 29 Aug; 4, 11, 19, 25 Sep and 2 Oct. Foliage injury was rated on a scale of 1–6; 1 = no apparent insect feeding; 2 = minor insect feeding on wrapper or outer leaves, 0-1% leaf area eaten; 3 = moderate insect feeding on wrapper outer leaves with no head damage, 2-5% leaf area eaten; 4 = moderate insect feeding on wrapper or outer leaves with minor feeding on head, 6-10% leaf head unmarketable during normal marketing conditions; 5 = moderate to heavy feeding on wrapper and head leaves and moderate number of feeding scars on head, 11 -30% of leaf area eaten; 6 = considerable insect feeding on wrapper and head leaves with head having numerous feeding scars, over 30% of leaf area eaten.

Control of Cabbage Looper, Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbageworm on Cabbage with Pyrethroid Insecticides, 1996