z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization Using Heuristic Penalty Methods and Asynchronous Parallel Generating Set Search
Author(s) -
Joshua Griffin,
Tamara G. Kolda
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
applied mathematics research express
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1687-1200
pISSN - 1687-1197
DOI - 10.1093/amrx/abq003
Subject(s) - penalty method , mathematical optimization , constrained optimization , heuristic , optimization problem , smoothing , parameterized complexity , mathematics , set (abstract data type) , sequence (biology) , computer science , algorithm , biology , genetics , statistics , programming language
Many optimization problems are characterized by expensive objective and/or constraint function evaluations paired with a lack of derivative information. Direct search methods such as generating set search (GSS) are well understood and efficient for derivative-free optimization of unconstrained and linearly constrained problems. This paper presents a study of heuristic algorithms that address the more difficult problem of general nonlinear constraints where derivatives for objective or constraint functions are unavailable. We focus on penalty methods that use GSS to solve a sequence of linearly constrained problems, numerically comparing different penalty functions. A classical choice for penalizing constraint violations is 2 , the squared 2 norm, which has advantages for derivative-based optimization methods. In our numerical tests, however, we show that exact penalty functions based on the 1, 2 ,a nd ∞ norms converge to good approximate solutions more quickly and thus are attractive alternatives. Unfortunately, exact penalty functions are nondifferentiable and consequently degrade the final solution accuracy, so we also consider smoothed variants. Smoothed-exact penalty functions are attractive because they retain the differentiability of the original problem. Numerically, they are a compromise between exact and 2 , i.e., they converge to a good solution somewhat quickly without sacrificing much solution accuracy. Moreover, the smoothing is parameterized and can potentially be adjusted to balance the two considerations. Since our

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom