Innovative Negligence Rules
Author(s) -
Giuseppe DariMattiacci,
Luigi Alberto Franzoni
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american law and economics review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1465-7260
pISSN - 1465-7252
DOI - 10.1093/aler/aht021
Subject(s) - harm , verifiable secret sharing , order (exchange) , risk analysis (engineering) , actuarial science , business , computer security , law and economics , economics , microeconomics , computer science , psychology , finance , social psychology , set (abstract data type) , programming language
Often, injurers or victims (or both) can adopt a new technology that reduces the social costs of accidents. When adoption costs are not verifiable in court, optimal adoption decisions cannot be induced by means of an appropriate determination of negligence. Hence the parties might either over- or under-adopt. We study how due-care standards should be conditioned on the technology adopted by the parties in order to improve adoption decisions. We demonstrate that standards should be biased upwards or downwards, depending on whether the new technology reduces or increases expected harm
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom