z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing Arterial Function Parameters for the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Events
Author(s) -
Elizabeth Hom,
Daniel Duprez,
David R. Jacobs,
David A. Bluemke,
Lyndia C. Brumback,
Joseph F. Polak,
Carmen A. Peralta,
Philip Greenland,
Sheryl Magzamen,
João A.C. Lima,
Alban Redheuil,
David M. Herrington,
James H. Stein,
Dhananjay Vaidya,
Pamela Ouyang,
Joel D. Kaufman
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.33
H-Index - 256
eISSN - 1476-6256
pISSN - 0002-9262
DOI - 10.1093/aje/kww113
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , confidence interval , hazard ratio , pulse pressure , receiver operating characteristic , blood pressure , coronary artery disease , carotid ultrasonography , carotid arteries
Arterial dysfunction has been linked to decline in cardiac function and increased risk of cardiovascular disease events. We calculated the value of arterial function, measured at baseline (2000-2002), in predicting time to first coronary heart disease (CHD) event (median follow-up, 10.2 years) among participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Measures included the following: C 1 and C 2 , derived from diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial artery blood pressure waveform obtained by tonometry (n = 6,336); carotid distensibility and Young's elastic modulus at the carotid artery, derived from carotid artery ultrasonography (n = 6,531 and 6,528); and aortic distensibility, measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (n = 3,677). After adjustment, the hazard ratio for a CHD event per standard-deviation increment in arterial function was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.10) for C 1 , 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.86) for C 2 , 0.98 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.11) for carotid distensibility, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.09) for Young's modulus, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.10) for aortic distensibility. We examined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model with full adjustment plus the addition of each measure individually. C 2 provided additional discrimination for the prediction of CHD (area under the curve = 0.736 vs. 0.743; P = 0.04). Lower C 2 was associated with a higher risk of future CHD events.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom