z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Five Authors Reply
Author(s) -
Katherine L. Grantz,
Stefanie N. Hinkle,
Pauline Mendola,
Lindsey A. Sjaarda,
Paul S. Albert
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.33
H-Index - 256
eISSN - 1476-6256
pISSN - 0002-9262
DOI - 10.1093/aje/kwv277
Subject(s) - medicine
We appreciate the interest of Smits et al. (1) in our study (2). They raised an interesting point regarding possible “index event bias,” which is essentially a form of collider stratification bias that becomes possible when studying recurrent conditions. This can result in bias toward the null in crude associations between the risk factor of interest and disease outcome. One of the strengths of our study was our ability to adjust for multiple possible risk factors; however, the ability to adjust for unknown risk factors is a limitation in all epidemiologic studies and not only in this setting. Further, we agree with a point made by the authors in a prior publication (3); namely, the methods currently available to address index event bias in research related to the causal etiology of recurrent events are lacking, and additional methodological work is still needed to adequately address this issue.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom