z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of the Value of Waist Circumference and Metabolomics in the Estimation of Visceral Adipose Tissue
Author(s) -
Sebastiaan C. Boone,
Maarten van Smeden,
Frits R. Rosendaal,
Saskia le Cessie,
Rolf H. H. Groenwold,
J. Wouter Jukema,
Ko Willems van Dijk,
Hildo J. Lamb,
Philip Greenland,
Ian J. Neeland,
Matthew Allison,
Michael H. Criqui,
Matthew J. Budoff,
Lars Lind,
Joel Kullberg,
Håkan Åhlström,
Dennis O. MookKanamori,
Renée de Mutsert
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
american journal of epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.33
H-Index - 256
eISSN - 1476-6256
pISSN - 0002-9262
DOI - 10.1093/aje/kwab298
Subject(s) - waist , medicine , circumference , anthropometry , adipose tissue , mean squared error , calibration , obesity , statistics , mathematics , geometry
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a strong prognostic factor for cardiovascular disease and a potential target for cardiovascular risk stratification. Because VAT is difficult to measure in clinical practice, we estimated prediction models with predictors routinely measured in general practice and VAT as outcome using ridge regression in 2,501 middle-aged participants from the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study, 2008–2012. Adding waist circumference and other anthropometric measurements on top of the routinely measured variables improved the optimism-adjusted R2 from 0.50 to 0.58 with a decrease in the root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 45.6 to 41.5 cm2 and with overall good calibration. Further addition of predominantly lipoprotein-related metabolites from the Nightingale platform did not improve the optimism-corrected R2 and RMSE. The models were externally validated in 370 participants from the Prospective Investigation of Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS, 2006–2009) and 1,901 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA, 2000–2007). Performance was comparable to the development setting in PIVUS (R2 = 0.63, RMSE = 42.4 cm2, calibration slope = 0.94) but lower in MESA (R2 = 0.44, RMSE = 60.7 cm2, calibration slope = 0.75). Our findings indicate that the estimation of VAT with routine clinical measurements can be substantially improved by incorporating waist circumference but not by metabolite measurements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom