English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background A history of a previous fall is one of the best predictors of future falls, increasing its risk 3-fold. The Health Service Executive (HSE) best practice guidelines recommend that all patients aged over 65 years in contact with healthcare professionals should be asked routinely whether they have fallen in the past year and asked about the fall-frequency, context and characteristics. The aim of this audit was to increase falls recognition by medical professionals following the implementation of a falls screening questionnaire into the admission proforma of an acute hospital. Methods This was a clinical audit. Data was collected on 29 consecutive patients aged &gt; 65 who were admitted via the emergency department of an acute hospital over a 6 day period. Data on falls was collected using the medical admissions hospital proforma during the first 72 hours. Following the initial audit, a new proforma containing a falls screening questionnaire (as per best practice guidelines) was introduced and an information session provided on its use. A re-audit of 17 admitted medical patients was then completed over the next 72 hours. Results The initial audit highlighted poor assessment of falls with only 3 (25%) patients being screened at admission. 1 (33%) had a fall; described as mechanical. Following introduction of a falls screening questionnaire into the admission proforma, a re-audit showed a significant increase, with 58% of admissions now being screened. Of these, 40% had fallen in the last year: 75% of falls were mechanical and 25% due to other causes. Conclusion This audit shows that falls in this patient population was largely unrecognised by medical professionals. Following implementation of a screening questionnaire, significant improvements were made. This audit concludes that implementation of a falls screening questionnaire into the medical admissions proforma is an effective method in identifying falls in older patients admitted to hospital.

289 Detection of Falls in Older Patients by Medical Professionals on Admission to Hospital: An Audit