z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Enrolment of older adults with cancer in early phase clinical trials—an observational study on the experience in the north west of England
Author(s) -
Fábio Gomes,
Tine Descamps,
Jessica Lowe,
Martin Little,
Rosie Lauste,
Matthew Krebs,
Donna M. Graham,
Fiona Thistlethwaite,
Louise Carter,
Natalie Cook
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
age and ageing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.014
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1468-2834
pISSN - 0002-0729
DOI - 10.1093/ageing/afab091
Subject(s) - medicine , referral , observational study , cohort , propensity score matching , clinical endpoint , retrospective cohort study , cohort study , cancer , comorbidity , clinical trial , pediatrics , family medicine
older patients represent the majority of cancer patients but are under-represented in trials, particularly early phase clinical trials (EPCTs). Material and Methods observational retrospective study of patients referred for EPCTs (January–December 2018) at a specialist cancer centre in the UK. The primary aim was to analyse the successful enrolment into EPCTs according to age (<65/65+). The secondary aims were to identify enrolment obstacles and the outcomes of enrolled patients. Patient data were analysed at: referral; in-clinic assessment and after successful enrolment. Among patients assessed in clinic, a sample was defined by randomly matching the older cohort with the younger cohort (1:1) by tumour type. Results 555 patients were referred for EPCTs with a median age of 60 years, of whom 471 were assessed in new patient clinics (38% were 65+). From those assessed, a randomly tumour-matched sample of 318 patients (159 per age cohort) was selected. Older patients had a significantly higher comorbidity score measured by ACE-27 (P < 0.0001), lived closer to the hospital (P = 0.045) and were referred at a later point in their cancer management (P = 0.002). There was no difference in suitability for EPCTs according to age with overall 84% deemed suitable. For patients successfully enrolled into EPCTs, there was no difference between age cohorts (20.1 vs. 22.6% for younger and older, respectively; P = 0.675) and no significant differences in their safety and efficacy outcomes. Discussion older age did not affect the enrolment into EPCTs. However, the selected minority referred for EPCTs suggests a pre-selection upstream by primary oncologists.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom