English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Awareness of sarcopenia and frailty is growing and both are known to be potentially reversible with effective resistance training. We aimed to establish whether existing exercise programmes offered to people with sarcopenia or frailty adhere to the known evidence base. Methods We conducted a national on-line survey of practitioners delivering exercise programmes to older people with sarcopenia or frailty. The link to the online survey was distributed through the British Geriatrics Society, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Special Interest Group for Older People (AGILE), the NHS England Future Collaboration Platform “Supporting People Living with Frailty” forum and social media. Questions covered target population and aims of the exercise programme, type, duration and frequency of exercise, progress assessment and outcome measures. Descriptive analyses were conducted using SPSS v24. Results 136 responses were received from respondents who worked for NHS Trusts, clinical commissioning groups, private practices, and third sector providers. 94% of respondents reported prescribing or delivering exercise programmes to people with sarcopenia or frailty. Most programmes (81/135 [60%]) were primarily designed to prevent or reduce falls. Resistance training was reported as the main focus of the programme in only 11/123 (9%); balance training was the main focus in 61/123 (50%) and functional exercise in 28/123 (23%). Exercise was offered once a week or less by 81/124 (65%) of respondents; the median number of sessions offered was 8.5 (IQR 6 to 12). Outcome measures suitable for assessing the effect of resistance training programmes were reported by fewer than half of respondents (hand grip: 13/119 [11%]; chair stands: 55/119 [46%], short physical performance battery: 4/119 [3%]). Conclusions Current exercise programmes offered to older people with sarcopenia or frailty lack the frequency, duration or specificity of exercise likely to improve outcomes for this group of patients.

48 Do Exercise Programmes for Older People with Sarcopenia or Frailty Deliver An Evidence-Based Service? Findings From A UK Survey