English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

A cyclic permutation $\pi:\{1, \dots, N\}\to \{1, \dots, N\}$ has a \emph{block structure} if there is a partition of $\{1, \dots, N\}$ into $k\notin\{1,N\}$ segments (\emph{blocks}) permuted by $\pi$; call $k$ the \emph{period} of this block structure. Let $p_1<\dots <p_s$ be periods of all possible block structures on $\pi$. Call the finite string $(p_1/1,$ $p_2/p_1,$ $\dots,$ $p_s/p_{s-1}, N/p_s)$ the {\it renormalization tower of $\pi$}. The same terminology can be used for \emph{patterns}, i.e., for families of cycles of interval maps inducing the same (up to a flip) cyclic permutation. A renormalization tower $\mathcal M$ \emph{forces} a renormalization tower $\mathcal N$ if every continuous interval map with a cycle of pattern with renormalization tower $\mathcal M$ must have a cycle of pattern with renormalization tower $\mathcal N$. We completely characterize the forcing relation among renormalization towers. Take the following order among natural numbers: $ 4\gg 6\gg 3\gg \dots \gg 4n\gg 4n+2\gg 2n+1\gg\dots \gg 2\gg 1 $ understood in the strict sense. We show that the forcing relation among renormalization towers is given by the lexicographic extension of this order. Moreover, for any tail $T$ of this order there exists an interval map for which the set of renormalization towers of its cycles equals $T$.

Address

About

Learn

Download the Zendy App

Discover

Explore