z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mathematical Biology is Good for Mathematics
Author(s) -
Michael C. Reed
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
notices of the american mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.246
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1088-9477
pISSN - 0002-9920
DOI - 10.1090/noti1288
Subject(s) - mathematical and theoretical biology , mathematics education , mathematics , biology , bioinformatics
A bout ten years ago I wrote an article, “Why is Mathematical Biology so Hard?” for these Notices intending to explain why the applications of mathematics to biology would be very different than the traditional applications to physics and engineering [42]. A lot has happened since then. Mathematical biology has grown from a small field, containing relatively few mathematicians, to a major branch of applied mathematics. The reasons for this growth, which are implicit in the discussion below, are not the point of this article, nor do I want to encourage mathematicians to switch to mathematical biology. Rather, I want to make the case that mathematical biology benefits all mathematicians; it is good for the health of mathematics as a whole.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom