Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
Author(s) -
Anja Conev,
Eleni Litsa,
Marissa R. Perez,
Mani Diba,
Antonios G. Mikos,
Lydia E. Kavraki
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
tissue engineering part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.964
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-335X
pISSN - 1937-3341
DOI - 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0191
Subject(s) - 3d printing , computer science , factorial experiment , context (archaeology) , design of experiments , fused deposition modeling , classifier (uml) , artificial intelligence , engineering drawing , machine learning , mechanical engineering , engineering , mathematics , paleontology , statistics , biology
Various material compositions have been successfully used in 3D printing with promising applications as scaffolds in tissue engineering. However, identifying suitable printing conditions for new materials requires extensive experimentation in a time and resource-demanding process. This study investigates the use of Machine Learning (ML) for distinguishing between printing configurations that are likely to result in low-quality prints and printing configurations that are more promising as a first step toward the development of a recommendation system for identifying suitable printing conditions. The ML-based framework takes as input the printing conditions regarding the material composition and the printing parameters and predicts the quality of the resulting print as either "low" or "high." We investigate two ML-based approaches: a direct classification-based approach that trains a classifier to distinguish between low- and high-quality prints and an indirect approach that uses a regression ML model that approximates the values of a printing quality metric. Both modes are built upon Random Forests. We trained and evaluated the models on a dataset that was generated in a previous study, which investigated fabrication of porous polymer scaffolds by means of extrusion-based 3D printing with a full-factorial design. Our results show that both models were able to correctly label the majority of the tested configurations while a simpler linear ML model was not effective. Additionally, our analysis showed that a full factorial design for data collection can lead to redundancies in the data, in the context of ML, and we propose a more efficient data collection strategy.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom