Physician Awareness and Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Diagnosis of Vaginitis Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review
Author(s) -
Paul Nyirjesy,
Wendy M. Banker,
Tiffany M. Bonus
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
population health management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 1942-7905
pISSN - 1942-7891
DOI - 10.1089/pop.2020.0258
Subject(s) - medicine , trichomoniasis , bacterial vaginosis , vaginitis , guideline , medline , family medicine , gynecology , pathology , political science , law
Vaginitis is one of the main causes of primary care and gynecological visits in the United States. The most common infectious causes are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. A physician survey was conducted to measure awareness of vaginitis clinical guidelines and availability of in-office point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools. Participants were asked to perform a chart review to evaluate diagnostic practices for their symptomatic vaginitis patients. A total of 333 physicians and 984 patient charts were included. Physicians were most familiar with VVC and BV diagnostic guidelines; fewer than half were aware of current trichomoniasis guidelines. Although access to POC tools used to evaluate and diagnose vaginitis varied by practice, there was limited access to all 3 tools (microscope, pH test strips, potassium hydroxide solution) required to perform a full Amsel workup for BV (47% obstetricians/gynecologists vs. 32% primary care physicians, P < .05). Based on guidelines, 66% of patients evaluated for VVC, 45% of patients evaluated for BV, and 17% evaluated for trichomoniasis received an optimal workup. Among trichomoniasis positive patients, 75% received chlamydia/gonorrhea testing, 42% were tested for HIV, partner therapy was noted in 59% of cases, and 47% returned to be retested within 3 months. Limited awareness of recommended diagnostic practices and lack of access to POC tools contributed to broad guideline nonadherence. This study demonstrates that clinicians commonly fall short of current guidelines and suggests the need for lab-based assessments and appropriate insurance coverage to fill the present diagnostic void.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom