z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Sequel to the Eteplirsen Saga: Eteplirsen Is Approved in the United States but Was Not Approved in Europe
Author(s) -
Annemieke AartsmaRus,
Nathalie Goemans
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
nucleic acid therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.255
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 2159-3345
pISSN - 2159-3337
DOI - 10.1089/nat.2018.0756
Subject(s) - medicine , family medicine , alternative medicine , agency (philosophy) , expert opinion , traditional medicine , pathology , intensive care medicine , philosophy , epistemology
Eteplirsen was approved for the treatment of eligible patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in September 2016 in one of the most, if not the most, controversial approvals ever made by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States. Two years later, the Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency gave a negative opinion for eteplirsen treatment. They had done so as well in May 2018, after which Sarepta (the company developing eteplirsen) appealed and a new evaluation was initiated, including a Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) meeting involving DMD experts and patient representatives. However, after reevaluation the opinion of the CHMP remained negative. In this commentary, we outline how differences in the perspective of FDA and EMA can lead to a DMD therapy being approved by FDA but not EMA, and vice versa.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom