z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Bioimpedance Spectroscopy-Based Method for Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Lymphedema
Author(s) -
Megan L. Steele,
Monika Janda,
Dimitrios Vagenas,
Leigh C. Ward,
Bruce Cornish,
Robyn Box,
Susan Gordon,
Melanie Matthews,
Sally D. Poppitt,
Lindsay D. Plank,
Wilson Yip,
Angela Rowan,
Hildegard ReulHirche,
Andreas Obermair,
Sandra C. Hayes
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
lymphatic research and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1557-8585
pISSN - 1539-6851
DOI - 10.1089/lrb.2018.0078
Subject(s) - lymphedema , medicine , receiver operating characteristic , logistic regression , body mass index , area under the curve , cancer , breast cancer
Background: This study aimed at testing whether arm-to-leg ratios of extracellular water (ECW) and ECW normalized to intracellular water (ICW), measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), can accurately detect bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema, and whether accounting for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) improves the diagnostic performance of cut-offs. Methods and Results: We conducted a dual-approach, case-control study consisting of cases of bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema and healthy controls who self-reported absence of lymphedema. The diagnostic performance using normative data-derived cut-offs (i.e., mean + 0.5 standard deviation [SD] to mean + 3 SD; n  = 136, 66% controls) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-derived cut-offs ( n  = 746, 94% controls) was assessed. The impact of sex, age, and BMI was investigated by comparing stratified and nonstratified normative data-derived cut-offs, and ROC curves generated from adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW between mean + 0.5 SD and mean + 1 SD showed fair to good sensitivity (0.73-0.84) and poor to good specificity (0.64 to 0.84). Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW/ICW failed to detect lymphedema (sensitivity <0.5). Stratification by sex, or by sex and age, yielded similar results to nonstratified cut-offs. Cut-offs derived from adjusted ROC curves showed both good sensitivity (0.83-0.89) and specificity (0.8-0.84). Conclusion: These findings represent new BIS criteria for diagnosing lower-limb lymphedema that do not rely on comparison to baseline measures or the presence of a nonaffected, contralateral limb.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom