Application of Digital Tomosynthesis in the Diagnosis of Urolithiasis: Comparison with MDCT

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of digital tomosynthesis in urolithiasis compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Subjects and Methods: This study received the approval of institutional review board and obtained the informed consents of all subjects. Fifty patients with acute renal colic and hematuria from February 2014 to February 2015 were enrolled. They underwent both MDCT and digital tomosynthesis. Images were interpreted by two experienced radiologists, and inter-reader agreement was assessed. The diagnostic performance of urinary stones with digital tomosynthesis and MDCT was compared. The entrance surface dose (ESD) in MDCT and digital tomosynthesis for patients was measured and compared. Results: No significant difference was found between digital tomosynthesis and MDCT in the diagnosis of urinary stones ( X 2  = 1.357, p  > 0.05). The ESD in digital tomosynthesis was lower than that in both routine-dose and low-dose MDCT for patients ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions: Digital tomosynthesis has great diagnostic value in urolithiasis. Compared with MDCT, digital tomosynthesis can significantly decrease ESD for patients and financial loan with a similar detection rate.