z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Core and Peripheral Criteria of Video Game Addiction in the Game Addiction Scale for Adolescents
Author(s) -
Geir Scott Brunborg,
Daniel Hanss,
Rune Aune Mentzoni,
Ståle Pallesen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cyberpsychology behavior and social networking
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.199
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 2152-2723
pISSN - 2152-2715
DOI - 10.1089/cyber.2014.0509
Subject(s) - confirmatory factor analysis , structural equation modeling , addiction , psychology , core (optical fiber) , norwegian , categorization , scale (ratio) , population , measurement invariance , clinical psychology , social psychology , statistics , medicine , psychiatry , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , telecommunications , linguistics , philosophy , physics , environmental health , quantum mechanics
Assessment of video game addiction often involves measurement of peripheral criteria that indicate high engagement with games, and core criteria that indicate problematic use of games. A survey of the Norwegian population aged 16-74 years (N=10,081, response rate 43.6%) was carried out in 2013, which included the Gaming Addiction Scale for Adolescents (GAS). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a two-factor structure, which separated peripheral criteria from core criteria, fitted the data better (CFI=0.963; RMSEA=0.058) compared to the original one-factor solution where all items are determined to load only on one factor (CFI=0.905, RMSEA=0.089). This was also found when we analyzed men aged ≤33 years, men aged >33 years, women aged ≤33 years, and women aged >33 years separately. This indicates that the GAS measures both engagement and problems related to video games. Multi-group measurement invariance testing showed that the factor structure was valid in all four groups (configural invariance) for the two-factor structure but not for the one-factor structure. A novel approach to categorization of problem gamers and addicted gamers where only the core criteria items are used (the CORE 4 approach) was compared to the approach where all items are included (the GAS 7 approach). The current results suggest that the CORE 4 approach might be more appropriate for classification of problem gamers and addicted gamers compared to the GAS 7 approach.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom