z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Perspectives of Sickle Cell Disease Stakeholders on Heritable Genome Editing
Author(s) -
Brittany M. Hollister,
Mariclare C. Gatter,
Khadijah E. Abdallah,
Alyssa J. Armsby,
Ashley Buscetta,
Yen Ji Julia Byeon,
Kayla E. Cooper,
Stacy Desine,
Anitra Persaud,
Kelly E. Ormond,
Vence L. Bonham
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the crispr journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2573-1602
pISSN - 2573-1599
DOI - 10.1089/crispr.2019.0034
Subject(s) - disease , psychological intervention , crispr , genome editing , political science , public health , public relations , medicine , biology , genetics , gene , nursing , pathology
Advances in CRISPR technology and the announcement of the first gene-edited babies have sparked a global dialogue about the future of heritable genome editing (HGE). There has been an international call for public input to inform a substantive debate about benefits and risks of HGE. This study investigates the views of the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. We utilized a mixed-methods approach to examine SCD stakeholders' views in the United States. We found SCD stakeholders hold a nuanced view of HGE. Assuming the technology is shown to be safe and effective, they are just as supportive of HGE as genetics professionals, but more supportive than the general public. However, they are also concerned about the potential implications of HGE, despite this support. As discourse surrounding HGE advances, it is crucial to engage disease communities and other key stakeholders whose lives could be altered by these interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom