The Promise of CRISPR for Human Germline Editing and the Perils of “Playing God”
Author(s) -
Larry G. Locke
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the crispr journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2573-1602
pISSN - 2573-1599
DOI - 10.1089/crispr.2019.0033
Subject(s) - crispr , rhetorical question , criticism , germline , epistemology , environmental ethics , sociology , political science , philosophy , genetics , biology , law , linguistics , gene
In the midst of the media and professional exuberance regarding the potential benefits of CRISPR technology, voices of criticism and caution have also arisen. One of the thorniest such cautions has been the common objection that CRISPR allows bioscientists to "play God," particularly when it comes to potentially editing the human germline. Many in the biotechnology field are unsure how to address this concern. What does it mean, particularly for bioscientists who may not have any rational or rhetorical categories for God? In this article, I explore possible meanings of "playing God" and the arguments for how those meanings might be applied in the utilization of CRISPR technology for human germline editing. I then test the validity of those arguments and explore potential counterarguments. Finally, I discuss how members of the bioscience community might respond to the objection of "playing God" and contribute to that dialogue in ways that could impact the future of CRISPR development and applications.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom